Publications

Science is the Prescription: Why Science Matters for Appropriate Pharmaceutical Care

The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences has published its advisory report “Science is the Prescription”, a comprehensive analysis of how scientific research must underpin pharmaceutical care across its full life cycle. The report is grounded in a clear and pressing context. Healthcare systems face growing pressure due to ageing populations, rising costs, workforce shortages, and increasing demand for innovative treatments. In this context, the report argues for a shift towards “appropriate pharmaceutical care”, defined as care that is effective, affordable, patient-centred, and sustainable. A central message of the report is that scientific research must not be limited to early drug development. It must play a continuous role across the entire life cycle of medicines, from prioritisation and clinical trials to post-registration use and real-world evaluation. This includes strengthening evidence generation beyond regulatory approval, where uncertainty on real-world effectiveness often remains. The report highlights several key gaps in current pharmaceutical systems. Drug development priorities are often driven by commercial incentives rather than public health needs. At the same time, many medicines are authorised based on limited or indirect evidence, with insufficient data on long-term outcomes or real-world effectiveness. To address these challenges, the report calls for a stronger integration of science into decision-making. This includes: • Aligning research priorities with unmet medical needs and disease burden • Expanding post-registration research to assess real-world effectiveness and optimise use • Developing “learning healthcare systems” where clinical data continuously informs practice • Strengthening patient involvement in research and decision-making • Enhancing collaboration between academia, regulators, policymakers, and industry Importantly, the report also emphasises that scientific evidence alone is not sufficient. Decisions on pharmaceutical care must also consider ethical, social, and economic dimensions, including fairness, solidarity, and sustainability. This publication strongly resonates with ongoing discussions within the FEAM network, particularly on the appropriate use of medicines, the role of evidence in policy, and the need to ensure that innovation translates into meaningful health outcomes. It provides a solid scientific and policy foundation to inform future work at European level, including ongoing reflections on data use, access to medicines, and healthcare sustainability.

See the publication

30 / 03 / 2026

Strengthening rehabilitation research and innovation in times of war. An invitation from the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine

The National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine has shared a series of ongoing and planned research initiatives focused on medical, psychosocial, and functional rehabilitation in the context of full scale armed aggression against Ukraine. Operating under exceptional conditions, the Academy has prioritised research and clinical innovation to respond to the urgent and long term needs of injured civilians, veterans, and affected populations. Current areas of work include innovations in rehabilitation for war related injuries, such as advanced restorative treatments, prosthetics, neuro rehabilitation, and multidisciplinary care models. The Academy is also developing artificial intelligence driven solutions for rehabilitation, including digital tracking tools for veterans, telemedicine applications, and improved medical and rehabilitation data systems. Additional initiatives focus on the rehabilitation of adolescents affected by war, with attention to physical, psychological, and social development, as well as gender sensitive rehabilitation approaches tailored to female veterans and female military personnel. Another key area is the development of an inclusive, community based rehabilitation ecosystem, integrating medical and social services and improving patient pathways through interagency cooperation. The National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine has expressed strong interest in deeper engagement with FEAM and its members through joint research projects, expert input, academic exchanges, and collaboration on funding opportunities. These initiatives aim to contribute not only to Ukraine’s recovery, but also to the development of rehabilitation models with relevance across Europe.

See the publication

01 / 02 / 2026

FEAM Forum One Health in action: advancing cross sector collaboration

On 30 April, the FEAM Forum hosted the webinar “One Health in Action: Advancing Cross-Sector Collaboration”, chaired by Dr André Jestin, Chair of FEAM’s One Health Committee. The event brought together experts from Forum partner organisations, including Dr Nancy DeBriyne (Federation of Veterinarians of Europe), Diana Texeira (Animal Health Europe), and Professor Marija Jevtic (European Health Management Association). They were joined by Professor Tuomas Aivelo, member of the SAPEA Working Group on One Health Governance in the EU and Associate Professor at Leiden University. The webinar is available on our youtube channel. The panel shared their experiences in cross-sectoral collaboration and reflected on the steps needed to strengthen the One Health approach. Several common themes emerged throughout the discussion: One Health is broader than AMR and zoonoses. It encompasses pandemic prevention, environmental health, and the human-animal bond—areas that have received less attention compared to antimicrobial resistance and zoonotic diseases. Prevention and early detection are critical to effective One Health policies. Cross-sectoral research and professional training can help break down siloes and foster long-term collaboration. Stronger collaboration within sectors is just as important as coordination across them. Regular dialogue between sectors helps to identify issues early, overcome challenges, and build trust. Panellists also discussed findings from the SAPEA evidence review report “One Health Governance in the EU”, which presents case studies highlighting the evolution and diversity of One Health initiatives. Examples range from long-standing programmes like trichinosis surveillance—established in the 1860s—to more recent initiatives in urban settings that incorporate social justice, biodiversity, and governance dimensions. Together, these insights underline the importance of expanding the One Health lens, identifying best practices, and building collaborative structures that can respond to today’s complex health challenges.

See the publication

01 / 07 / 2025

Subscribe to our newsletter